With Singapore elections just ended, and all of Singapore's blogging youth having their say on various issues ranging from
party bullying to
podcasting and blogging restrictions, it does seem rather unlike me not to have put in my two cents worth. Perhaps, as I lose more and more the ability to relate to my hometown, I have grown increasingly more apathetic of the situation there. Or perhaps, not being back home in the midst of things, I don't feel I quite have the first-hand information I need to make informed commentary. Add to that the point that I feel many of the bloggers out there have made very clear and well set-out opinions (amongst other more brainless ones).
However, I did notice one thing recently, purely by accident. You see in Singapore there's kind of a battle of generations going on (it happens everywhere, but especially markedly back home) whereby the youth are accused of being radical and much too Western and the old are accused of being backward, ignorant of civil liberties and so on. I definitely have to agree with the latter, but while reading the local Chinese newspapers lately I have come to realise why people have such mindsets. You see, in Singapore the older and conservative party-voting sector of the population also tends to be chinese-educated. And for the last 2 weeks, EVERY DAY, the PAP (the ruling party) has featured on the front page (i.e. scroll down for less important world news).
Today, for example, I visit the
lianhe zaobao website, and I get a very nice 'overview' of the general elections thus far, starting with a nice happy picture of the PM on the left, a preview of the latest elections article, and all the headline stories on the elections from the past week:
PRIME MINISTER LEE HSIEN LOONG: CITIZENS GAVE HIM A CLEAR MANDATE
PAP WINS THE SEMBAWANG CONSTITUTENCY
PAP WINS THE ALJUNIED CONSTITUTENCY
PAP WINS THE PASIR RIS CONSTITUENCY
PAP WINS THE XXXX CONSTITUENCY
PAP WINS THE XXXX CONSTITUENCY
CHIAM SEE TONG WINS POTONG PASIR CONSTITUENCY
And this is today's story on the general elections (very roughly translated):
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong: Citizens Gave Him a Clear Mandate"In today's press conference held before dawn, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong expressed that the results of this general election showed clearly that the electorate had made a sensible choice, giving him a clear mandate, and he thanks the voters who had supported him and his party. He is very satisfied with these results.
...
As regards not being able to win the Hougang and Potong Pasir constituencies, the PM is disappointed, but he respects the voters' decision...he believes the PAP will eventually win back these two seats.
...
The PM said, it was not that the people who voted for the opposition objected to the ruling party's policies, for some of them it was just that they wanted to have opposition in government.
...
He also believed that Singaporean youth especially supported them at this election, evidenced from the fact that where the numbers of youths in a constituency was high, the PAP did particularly well."
Of course, these headlines are deserved in the sense that everything is technically, well, ALL TRUE. However, a few things strike me here:
1) There are quite clearly a few things missing from the Chinese news. What happened to the controversy over the rules on expression about the elections, whatever happened to the recent forum with Lee Kuan Yew and young journalists, whatever happened to the James Gomez issue and alleged bullying by PAP?
2) Whatever you can say about differences in writing style, I find it disturbing that press conferences seem to be interpreted more like Oscar award speeches with no two-way dialogue; perhaps these journalists are taking the literal Chinese translation of 'reporter' too seriously -
zi zhe, that is, 'memory person'.
3) Um, ok, I know the PAP won the elections, but does anyone else out there care for what they're actually going to DO in power, aside from trying to win back those two little lost constituencies?
4) Would ANY journalist NOT question a statement like 'it's not that nobody minds the ruling party, it's just that they would like to see some opposition in Parliament'??
So, in response to
Nick's frustration with a certain conservative middle-aged woman Tan Bee Lan, who 'felt sorry for the Minister Mentor' that he was confronted with 'young people with no concern for the past', I would venture a guess why people like her harbour such backward views.
The sad thing is, I don't think it's even a question of free speech; take away any restrictions on media liberties, and you'd probably get the same thing. I don't know what the hiring policy is at the
lianhe zaobao, but I have an image of an office full of brainwashed fossils. Call it a generation gap, call it narrow-mindedness, or call it pure contentment with the luxury of being able to sit on one's arse without a shred of political opinion, in a sterilised, organised, immobilised society.